A petition filed by Prempeh College challenging the semifinal results of the 2023 National Science and Maths Quiz (NSMQ) between Prempeh, Opoku Ware and Pope Johns Senior High School has been thrown out.
Opoku Ware beat Prempeh and Pope Johns to go through to the grand finale with Presec and Achimota School.
Prempeh College however raised issues with the final school in the semifinal and therefore sent a petition to the organisers, protesting the final results.
In dismissing the petition, the management of PrimeTime, organisers of the National Science and Maths Quiz defended the ruling of the quiz mistress and said Prempeh College was not “cheated” as was claimed in the petition.
In a petition dated October 19, 2023, Prempeh College called for a review, acceptance and an overturn of the results of the contest as opposed to an answer to a riddle question in the fifth round of the #NSMQ2023 competition.
This ranked Prempeh College with 36 points below Opoku Ware who secured 38 points leading them to the grand finale of the NSMQ 2023.
Response to Prempeh College
However, in a press statement responding to the Prempeh College’s protest of the results, the Managing Director of Primetime, Nana Akua Mensa-Bonsu affirmed the ruling of the quiz mistress in the said contest.
Results
According the MD of Primetime comments made by the Physics Consultant, Dr. Amos Kuditcher and the Quiz Mistress, Professor Elsie Effah Kaufmann, with respect to the review of the answer to the riddle explained that the clues in the riddle were intended to give a prompt and a specific response.
“The protest from Prempeh College concerns a riddle for which clues were given that point to the linear superposition principle. In interactions with the complainants on their protest, no reference to exponential superposition was made.”
“Instead, a nonlinear superposition relevant to intensity was given as a counterexample, which seemed to satisfy the protesters. Indeed, there are situations where electric fields participate in nonlinear processes in which combining two fields produces a field that does not equal the sum of the fields, the associated phenomena constituting a vibrant branch of Physics”.
These comments led the management to affirm the ruling of the quiz mistress with no bias whatsoever.
Conduct
The Managing Director further stated that they placed premium on fairness to all participating schools, to ensure that there is fairness in the adjudication of contests.
Thus she encouraged that Prempeh College would use the required procedures to address their grievances, rather than to resort to a smear campaign on social media.
“Sullying the reputation of the competition is not an action one takes when one is truly gracious in defeat; disagreeing, but accepting the outcome in good faith is graciousness in defeat she said.
“We would like to reiterate that Primetime has no interest whatsoever, in which school wins, or loses a contest, or, ultimately, the championship trophy. We place a very high premium on the integrity of the programme and so go to great lengths, too numerous to recount here, to protect it”
Attached below is a copy of the response from PrimeTime
October 21, 2023
COORDINATORS OF THE NSMQ TEAM PREMPEH COLLEGE SOFOLINE, KUMASIDear Coordinators,
RE: PROTEST OF RESULTS OF NSMQ SEMI-FINALS BETWEEN PREMPEH COLLEGE. OPOKU WARE SCHOOL AND POPE JOHN SHSWe write in reference to your petition on the above subject dated October 19, 2023, in which you disputed the answer to a riddle in the fifth round of the competition, and called for a review and acceptance of your contestant’s answer, as well as the overturn of the results of your contest in favour of Prempeh College.
In your petition, you cited many sources and claimed that the principle of superposition is the same as the principle of linear superposition and so your contestant’s answer of principle of superposition deserved full marks.
Below are the comments of the Physics Consultant, Dr. Amos Kuditcher and the Quiz Mistress, Professor Elsie Effah Kaufmann, with respect to the answer to the riddle:
The protest from Prempeh College concerns a riddle for which clues were given that point to the linear superposition principle. In interactions with the complainants on their protest, no reference to exponential superposition was made.
Instead, a nonlinear superposition relevant to intensity was given as a counterexample, which seemed to satisfy the protesters. Indeed, there are situations where electric fields participate in nonlinear processes in which combining two fields produces a field that does not equal the sum of the fields, the associated phenomena constituting a vibrant branch of Physics.
The clues in the riddle in question were intended to prompt the specific response
“(Principle of) Linear Superposition” and enough were given. The claim that no clue restricts the answer to linear superposition is not supported by clues 4 and 5.Specifically, the examples given in the last clue, namely, electric field and scalar potential calculations as practiced by SHS students, point directly to linear superposition. Electric circuits constitute a topic under electromagnetism, one of the examples given in clue 3. However, nonlinear electric circuits and devices are well-known, so it is not clear how a specific reference to electric circuits would restrict the answer to linear superposition. The clarity sought by the protesters in their letter is given on the last page of their document, where the principle of linear superposition as a linear combination is explained.
The Quiz Mistress exercises discretion on whether an answer provided by a contestant is sufficiently responsive and would have accepted the answer given by the Prempeh College contestants if, in her professional opinion, the target key and the answer given by the contestants were synonymous. She did not in this case, opting instead to maintain the more precise original key. When the complaint came to the attention of the Physics consultant, full consideration was given to all the issues raised and the protesters, after receiving complete attention, were satisfied with the explanation and counterexample that were given by the consultant.
The Quiz Mistress’s ruling is affirmed.
While we greatly appreciate Prempeh College’s keen interest and passion for the NSMQ, we draw the line at insinuations of bias and attempts to favour some schools. We place premium on fairness to all participating schools, which is why we allow protests from schools, to ensure that there is fairness in the adjudication of contests. Where a school’s protest is found to have merit, the error is rectified and the appropriate marks are awarded to them. Indeed, we are known to pause contests, so as to resolve a protest that has been made by a school. In this instance, the Prempeh team’s protest was reviewed by the Physics consultant, who then explained the concepts to the team, which the team accepted. Consequently, this turnaround and insinuation that a deliberate injustice has been carried out against Prempeh College is rather surprising.
The ability to protest a question, answer, or mode of adjudication is not a new one and we would like Prempeh College to use the procedure described in the NSMQ Rules to address their grievances, rather than to resort to a smear campaign on social media.
Sullying the reputation of the competition is not an action one takes when one is truly gracious in defeat; disagreeing, but accepting the outcome in good faith is graciousness in defeat.
We would like to reiterate that Primetime has no interest whatsoever, in which school wins, or loses a contest, or, ultimately, the championship trophy. We place a very high premium on the integrity of the programme and so go to great lengths, too numerous to recount here, to protect it.
It would be very unfortunate for anyone to dismiss the great effort and investment of time and money that the contestants and trainers put into preparing their teams to excel at this competition, by insinuating that Primetime is biased towards some schools and manipulates contests in their favour. A five-time champion knows, from experience, the challenges preparing for and triumphing over all other participants present to the team and how much hard work goes on behind the scenes and on stage, to produce excellent results at each edition of the NSMQ.
We appreciate the exciting and passionate contests you have given us at NSMQ 2023 and wish you the very best in future editions of the National Science & Maths Quiz.
Best regards.
Yours sincerely,
NANA AKUA A. MENSA-BONSU
MANAGING DIRECTOR
