Kenya’s Supreme Court on Tuesday laid out questions it will answer when it rules on this month’s disputed presidential election result, including whether the commission’s website was hacked.
Opposition leader Raila Odinga, who is seeking the presidency for the fifth time, is contesting the result of a tight vote after which the election commission chairman declared Deputy President William Ruto the winner.
Four out of the seven commissioners disowned the result.
The situation has raised fears of possible violence like the episodes after disputed polls in 2007 and 2017.
Kenya is a key western ally in an unstable region and it hosts the regional headquarters of many global companies and organisations.
Odinga’s legal team lodged a case alleging that a team working for Ruto hacked into the election system and replaced genuine pictures of polling station result forms with fake ones, thus increasing Ruto’s share.
Ruto denied the allegations.
The election commission has filed competing responses, with three commissioners supporting the process and four questioning it.
The Supreme Court will decide if the polling station returns were interfered with and whether the postponement of eight gubernatorial and legislative elections disadvantaged any candidate, said Chief Justice Martha Koome, the president of the seven-member court.
The court, whose decision on presidential election petitions is final, will consider whether there were unexplained disparities in votes cast for presidential and other races such as those for members of parliament, Koome said.
The court will also decide whether the tallying of presidential votes met constitutional standards, and whether Ruto attained the constitutional threshold of 50 percent plus one of the votes cast and whether any irregularities were substantial enough to nullify the poll, Koome said. —Aljazeera
The post Kenya Supreme Court lays out issues in presidential vote dispute appeared first on Ghanaian Times.